Archive for HerPolitics

This election is a matter of life or death

Kaley Costello founded “Run Against Rom­ney” to unite her pas­sion for fit­ness and her pas­sion for sup­port­ing a can­di­date who cham­pi­ons women’s rights. (Photo cour­tesy of Run Against Romney).

Peo­ple who say pol­i­tics are slightly per­sonal are absolutely wrong.

Pol­i­tics are com­pletely personal.

They define who we are, where we go, and what we have.

The elec­tion today requires a defin­i­tive ref­er­en­dum about what rights we believe we deserve and who we think our gov­ern­ment should protect.

Ohio is the unof­fi­cial “decider” of this elec­tion, and the vot­ers here are in the national spot­light, with their clash­ing view­points and con­cerns treated as a micro­cosm of the entire country.

One Ohio voter, who I know per­son­ally, demon­strates how a vote for Barack Obama is both a ratio­nal choice and neces­sity for pro­po­nents of women’s health and rights.

Kaley Costello caught HPV from a for­mer boyfriend, who she trusted with her heart and body. She not only received the news she had HPV, a com­mon dis­ease among Amer­i­can adults, but also dis­cov­ered she had a severe type, which could quickly lead to cer­vi­cal cancer.

Luck­ily, Kaley was able to get proper screen­ings and surgery because she was eli­gi­ble to receive care through the “Afford­able Health­care Act,” as she was young enough to receive care from a parent’s benefits.

Mil­lions of women who need pre­ven­ta­tive screen­ings, con­tra­cep­tion, or treat­ment for dis­eases that sig­nif­i­cantly affect women, such as cer­vi­cal and breast can­cers, cur­rently receive help through poli­cies or pro­grams Mitt Rom­ney would cut or eliminate.

Kaley is one of those women. Pol­i­tics is not some obscure idea that she can’t touch. A polit­i­cal con­vic­tion by Barack Obama is the rea­son she had pre­ven­ta­tive surgery instead of can­cer treatment.

Kaley started a move­ment, “Run Against Rom­ney,” to express her grat­i­tude and sup­port for Pres­i­dent Obama and his com­mit­ment to pro­tect women’s health. She encour­ages male and female run­ners to pur­chase “Run Against Rom­ney” shirts, to spread the word against Romney’s agenda dur­ing any­thing from a morn­ing run to a marathon.

When some­one sees a run­ner in her baby blue “Run Against Rom­ney” t-shirt, it is more than a polit­i­cal state­ment. It is big­ger than par­ti­san bick­er­ing. It is a com­mit­ment to the man who wanted all peo­ple in this coun­try to have a right to health­care. It is appre­ci­a­tion for a man who thinks fam­ily plan­ning and con­tra­cep­tion is a gov­ern­ment pri­or­ity, not nui­sance. It is a thank you to the man who believes Kaley’s body, and my body, and any other woman’s body is just that. Ours. And not any­one else’s.

I am proud of Kaley for telling her story. When sta­tis­tics have faces and voices, they are harder to ignore. Pol­i­tics are com­pletely per­sonal, and choos­ing a can­di­date defines you as a person.

Herlinked.com is proud to stand with Kaley and the mil­lions of women who will vote for Barack Hus­sein Obama because we refuse to lose the own­er­ship of our rights or our bodies.

We hope you take this elec­tion per­son­ally, too. Get out there and vote as if your life depends on it. Kaley’s did.

Her­link:

For more about Run Against Rom­ney and Kaley’s jour­ney, click here:

Run Against Romney

Posted in HerHealth, HerPolitics, Reproductive Rights, U.S., War on Women | Leave a comment

President Clinton’s side dish

And the gold medal for “Most depress­ing thing I saw on the Inter­net today” goes to…

This is the most con­found­ing muta­tion of the Obama “Hope” poster I’ve seen yet.

Accord­ing to this graphic, the Clin­ton pres­i­dency can be summed up as “Great econ­omy, no wars, and a lit­tle some­thing on the side.”

There’s some­thing hor­ri­bly wrong with all three parts of that sum­mary, but I want– no NEED– to focus on the “and a lit­tle some­thing on the side!” part.

Let’s talk about Clinton’s “side dish.”

Lewin­sky was 22 years old at the time of the affair. Clin­ton was about 30 years her senior. He was also her boss, who just hap­pened to hold maybe the most pow­er­ful political/economic office in the world. She was his intern–the power imbal­ance could not have been any greater. He ruined her life by grossly and I think crim­i­nally abus­ing that.

The kicker is that the Amer­i­can peo­ple* Clin­ton sup­pos­edly served awarded Lewin­sky with half– if not all– of the blame, all the while won­der­ing why the most pow­er­ful man in the world would want to sleep with a woman as “dumpy” as her.

That’s vic­tim blam­ing at its finest, folks. And more than a decade after the affair went pub­lic, some of us still don’t get it.

 

*In the inter­est of full dis­clo­sure, I used to be a Clin­ton apol­o­gist. I went as Lewin­sky for Hal­loween sopho­more year, for instance. I’m not proud of that. I was all, “Amer­i­cans are such Puri­tans about sex” and “Jour­nal­ists would NEVER have asked Jack Kennedy about his affairs” and “Even the pres­i­dent has a right to privacy.”

Guess what? I WAS WRONG.

I turned 22 two years ago. Let’s just say I’m really glad I’m not 22 anymore.

 

Posted in HerPolitics | Leave a comment

The post-welfare legacy of Bill Clinton

The New York TImes has an inter­est­ing piece up on the legacy of Pres­i­dent Clinton’s wel­fare reform efforts.  These efforts were a part of Clinton’s broader re-election strat­egy of tri­an­gu­la­tion: the attempt to co-opt the issues and views of one’s oppo­nents, thus pulling the rug out from under them.  In this spirit, Clin­ton, a baby-boomer, former-hippie Demo­c­rat, declared the era of big gov­ern­ment over and promised to end “wel­fare as we know it.”  Well, as we now know, the impli­ca­tions of the “reform” of wel­fare were cat­a­strophic for mil­lions of peo­ple and dis­pro­por­tion­ately affected the poor (duh!) and women:

The poor peo­ple who were dropped from cash assis­tance here, mostly sin­gle moth­ers, talk with sur­pris­ing open­ness about the des­per­ate, and some­times ille­gal, ways they make ends meet. They have sold food stamps, sold blood, skipped meals, shoplifted, dou­bled up with friends, scav­enged trash bins for bot­tles and cans and returned to rela­tion­ships with vio­lent part­ners — all with chil­dren in tow.

Got that?  “Mostly sin­gle mothers…with chil­dren in tow.”  Doesn’t sound like bar­bar­ians pound­ing at the gates of the Repub­lic, does it?  Clinton’s pur­suit of wel­fare reform was a shrew polit­i­cal maneu­ver, as he won re-election and increased Demo­c­ra­tic num­bers in Con­gress in the 1998 midterm elec­tions, but at what cost?  Clin­ton was cash­ing in on the con­ser­v­a­tive rhetor­i­cal game sur­round­ing wel­fare that began in the pre­vi­ous decade when Rea­gan sum­mar­ily con­demned “wel­fare queens” in their Cadil­lacs, run­ning around buy­ing fancy cars and pre­mium cuts of steak on the tax­payer dime.

So while it was a shrewd polit­i­cal maneu­ver, it was also a crass and despi­ca­ble act, exploit­ing the mis­in­formed, racist and sex­ist hatred against wel­fare recip­i­ents ini­tially ginned up by Rea­gan and his min­ions.  Thank­fully for Clin­ton he has a legacy to speak of; unfor­tu­nately for him, it will be a legacy tainted by the pain and suf­fer­ing of inno­cent fam­i­lies forced into the harsh cold by poli­cies he actively pur­sued, all so he could enjoy “four more years.”

HERLINK

Texts from Hillary

Posted in HerPolitics | Leave a comment

Score one for reproductive rights in Kentucky

Ken­tucky women and allies can breathe a lit­tle eas­ier (metaphor­i­cally, of course; it’s more pollen than air out there guys):

The Ken­tucky House Health and Wel­fare Com­mit­tee struck down three bills that would have restricted access to abortion yesterday.

Here’s what would have been:

SB 103 would have required that an ultra­sound be per­formed on a woman seek­ing an abor­tion and that the physi­cian attempt to show her the image of the fetus. Mer­ci­fully, the woman would have been allowed to look away.

SB 102 would have required in-person coun­sel­ing 24 hours before obtain­ing an abortion.

HB 164 would have banned abor­tions in which a fetal heart­beat was detected.

But these bills are going nowhere, at least for now.

Another rea­son to celebrate: Hunger Games debuts today, obvi­ously. Pre-movie imbib­ing will include themed cock­tails like The Haymitch, which I believe is sim­ply one guz­zle from a bot­tle of vodka (served warm).

May the odds…

HERLINK

Ken­tucky panel kills three abor­tion bills (Is that sup­posed to be punny, CoJo?)

Posted in HerPolitics, Kentucky, Kentucky, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fetal Seance Bill” sits before Kentucky House Committee

Via Bare­foot and Pro­gres­sive:

The Ken­tucky State Sen­ate last month passed a bill that would require doc­tors to force women seek­ing an abor­tion to have an ultrasound.

If the woman refuses to look at the forcible ultra­sound, the doc­tor would be required to explain the image at length and in detail.

It is unclear what hap­pens if the woman both averts her eyes and plugs up her ears and screams. Hope­fully both doc­tor and patient will be impris­oned for a very long time.

The “Fetal Seance Bill,” B&P’s term of endear­ment for SB 103, currently sits before the Ken­tucky House Stand­ing Com­mit­tee on Health and Wel­fare. Give ‘em hell.

Accord­ing to his bio, com­mit­tee chair Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Tom Burch (D-Louisville) has had rela­tions with the National Orga­ni­za­tion for Women and the Ken­tucky Domes­tic Vio­lence Asso­ci­a­tion. So, we shall see.

Posted in HerHealth, HerPolitics, Kentucky, Kentucky, Reproductive Rights | Leave a comment

International Women’s Day News Roundup

Happy Inter­na­tional Women’s Day, from.…a man.  Oh well, nev­er­mind the mes­sen­ger, here’s a quick roundup of the news from Inter­na­tional Women’s Day!

  • First off, from Time Mag­a­zine, we have a debate on the ques­tion of “Are Women Peo­ple?” that addresses some of the recent issues (San­dra Fluke, manda­tory ultra­sounds for abortion-happy ladies, etc) and con­sid­ers whether women are really sen­tient, autonomous beings any longer.
  • Think Progress has the dish on “Women’s Impact on the Econ­omy, By the Num­bers.”  Enlight­en­ing reading.
  • From The Daily Beast, we have cov­er­age of the third annual Women in the World sum­mit.  Sta­tus of women in the world?  Click to find out!
  • A bit belated, but here is a Wash­ing­ton Post piece on ways to cel­e­brate IWD. A bit cheeky for my taste, but eh, what the heck?  Click the clicky here.
  • From Michael Moore’s book Stu­pid White Men, here’s an excerpt about “The End of Men.”
  • From Brave New Films, pro­ducer of the doc­u­men­taries Out­foxed and Wal­mart: The High Cost of Low Prices, comes a look at how many times Rush Lim­baugh can slan­der women in ONE MINUTE!
  • And finally, from the Guardian News­pa­per back in the old coun­try, we have a trea­sure trove of user-submitted pho­tos cel­e­brat­ing IWD.  Our favorite?  The first one, for cel­e­brat­ing IWD with joy­ful vandalism:

That’s all for now.  Happy Inter­na­tional Women’s Day!

Posted in HerActivism, World | Leave a comment

If Sandra Fluke = Prostitute, Obama = Pimp

Yeah, some­one went there:

And here we have a mas­ter­ful response from Angry Black Lady:

Yeah, let that sink in. You’ve got the African-American Pres­i­dent is a 70′s pimp angle, the San­dra Fluke is a whore angle, the “evil light-skinned brother” angle, the white girl sub­servient to the black man angle, a com­plete mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion of Ms. Fluke’s state­ments to boot and it’s all rolled up into one big insult­ing awful pack­age of pure hatred for black peo­ple, women, and human beings with work­ing souls. It’s actu­ally impres­sive, in the same way ebola-tipped bul­lets fired into crowds of baby sloths is impres­sive: just over­whelm­ingly, unremit­tingly awful on mul­ti­ple levels.

I know I shouldn’t be, but I’m hung up on the image of a “crowd of baby sloths.”  Pow­er­ful imagery, that.  It looks like the vicious racism of the 2008 cam­paign is likely to look like pat-a-cake com­pared to the nasty onslaught com­ing down the pike for this year.

Head, meet desk.

A final note: if you’d like to drop the artist of that car­toon a line, here’s his con­tact info.

Posted in HerActivism, U.S. | Leave a comment

Statewide Fairness Rally Day 2012

I, for­tu­nately, have a full time job. Unfor­tu­nately, because of that full time job, I’ll have to miss this:

What: The Statewide Fair­ness Rally Day

When: Wednes­day, Feb­ru­ary 22

Where: the State Capi­tol (700 Capi­tol Ave.) in Frank­fort, KY

Why: To sup­port of the Statewide Fair­ness Bill and the anti-bullying bill.

Email lgbt@aclu-ky.org with questions.

And happy Fri­day, y’all!

Posted in HerPolitics, Kentucky | Leave a comment

Today was…not so good

There’s this and this and this, which is why I feel like this.

It’s Handmaid’s Tale: the Prequel.

But on the bright side: this! And another one gone and another gone, another bites the dustah!

Posted in HerHealth, HerPolitics | Leave a comment

Go Grimes

Happy elec­tion day, Ken­tuck­ians. We’ve got our­selves a new sec­re­tary of state, Ali­son Lun­der­gan Grimes. She’s truly a woman to watch.

Grimes may have had name recog­ni­tion and money on her side, but she worked hard, harder than any­one else in this race, and she won big over her oppo­nent, Repub­li­can Bill John­son (61% to 39% with 98% of precincts reporting).

Here’s a good con­trast between Grimes and John­son, accord­ing to the “Louisville Courier-Journal:”

She pro­posed expand­ing the num­ber of eli­gi­ble vot­ers in Ken­tucky, in part through a con­sti­tu­tional amend­ment mak­ing felons eli­gi­ble to vote auto­mat­i­cally when their sen­tences expire.

John­son said he would have culled inel­i­gi­ble vot­ers from the rolls and sup­ported leg­is­la­tion requir­ing vot­ers to present photo iden­ti­fi­ca­tion to cast their ballot.

Boo, voter suppression.

Grimes’ vic­tory means a lot. Accord­ing to the Sec­re­tary of States’ 2009 report, Ken­tucky ranks 45th in the coun­try for num­ber of women serv­ing in the leg­is­la­ture. We haven’t occu­pied the governor’s man­sion since Martha Layne Collins (nine­teen eighty freak­ing three, guys). Ken­tucky does not have a sin­gle female mem­ber of Con­gress. Much more could be said regard­ing over­all diver­sity in the state, but that is a mat­ter for a dif­fer­ent post.

 

Posted in HerPolitics, Kentucky | Leave a comment

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.